Riverside, California, UNITED STATES June 23, 2015:
A California Court of Appeals panel has held that a passenger who urged a driver to drive so fast the vehicle became airborne could potentially be held liable for injuries suffered by a pedestrian when the driver lost control of his car. Navarette v. Meyer, Fourth Distr. Ct. App. D067454.
Hayley Meyer was a passenger riding in a car driven by Brandon Coleman. Meyer suggested Coleman take a shortcut over a residential street posted for a 25 mph speed limit. Meyer knew dips in that roadway could make a speeding car airborne. Meyer told Coleman about the dips, and urged Coleman to attempt to catch air. Shortly after Coleman turned onto the street, Meyer urged Coleman to “go faster.” Coleman accelerated, his car took off, and Coleman lost control. His car hit a parked vehicle. Pedestrian Esteban Soto, standing next to the parked car, was crushed between the two vehicles and killed.
Soto’s wife Miriam and three children sued for wrongful death, naming both Coleman and Meyer as defendants. As to Meyer, the family alleged civil conspiracy and violation of Vehicle Code §21701, which provides no person “shall willfully interfere with the driver of a vehicle or with the mechanism thereof in such manner as to affect the driver’s
control of the vehicle.”
The trial court granted summary judgment for Meyer, finding no evidence to suggest Meyer’s urging Coleman to drive faster either affected Coleman’s control over the vehicle, or established a conspiracy.
The appellate panel reversed, holding Meyer in the case, noting that Soto’s family’s complaint raised issues of fact requiring a jury’s determination
In its opinion, the appellate panel noted the evidence at trial could support a jury finding Coleman accelerated the vehicle at Meyer’s request. For purposes of joint liability, a jury would need to decide whether Meyer urged Coleman with enough force to constitute an unlawful exhibition of speed, as prohibited by Vehicle Code §23109. The court held that the sort of injury that resulted from Coleman’s unlawful conduct, i.e., Coleman’s car losing control, striking another vehicle and harming a pedestrian, was foreseeable, and the very sort of harm that §23109 was designed to prevent.
Considering all possible defendants, in order to tap all available assets, is important in order to fully compensate the plaintiff. Any investigation into an accident should include the expertise of a private investigator and the unique resources they can access for the parties and attorneys on each side.
www.assetsearchpro.com can help you with this important service.
Go to www.assetsearchpro.com or call (800) 775-6132.
Filed under:Asset Searches, Blog, Private Detective, Private Investigator, Professional People Search Private Investigator,
The accuracy of data submitted by the requestor will directly determine the accuracy of results obtained. While the information we furnish is from reliable sources, its accuracy is not guaranteed. Use of available data may be affected by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act, and/or federal and state privacy laws. Our investigative reports are prepared by Asset Search Pro, at the specific instance and request of our clients. Clients agree by accepting our reports that reports and information received from Asset Search Pro, are strictly confidential, and are intended solely for our client's sole private, exclusive use. Any other use, communication, publication or reproduction of our reports, or any portion thereof, without the written consent of Asset Search Pro, is strictly forbidden. By ordering and accepting delivery of this report, our client agrees to indemnify Asset Search Pro, against any damages or claims resulting from any such unauthorized use. Our reports are not a recommendation, endorsement or approval of any kind, with respect to any specific transaction, decision or evaluation, and should not be relied on as such under any circumstances. All information contained in our reports is confidential and proprietary, i.e., our work product, hence our property as provider of our reports.
No warranty or guarantee of a particular outcome, result or recovery of information is promised or implied by Asset Search Pro, or by the materials presented on Assetsearchpro.com. Asset Search Pro agrees to work to achieve the goals of any client work or engagement with aggressive, professional methods, within the bounds of the law.
All sales are final. There are no refunds.
Charges for Work Performed; Credit Card Charges
All orders placed for process service, document-related services, deposition-related services, subpoenas, document preparation and/or investigative services of any kind or description through this website will regarded by both Parties hereto as firm orders, not subject to cancellation after work has begun, other than as the Parties shall subsequently agree in writing. All credit card transactions will carry an extra three percent (3%) fee to cover bank credit card processing fees. By paying any advance or invoice, Client acknowledges that Client has reviewed and agreed to these terms and conditions. All sales are final and non-refundable. There is no guarantee of success.